You'll never have to worry about hiring an expensive web designer or not being able to make changes to your website in a timely manner again. And when it's time to add a domain name, you simply choose one and it's automatically set up to work with your site. Our easy to use drag and drop editor makes it a breeze to place photos, text, and other elements exactly where you'd like them to appear on your page. With WebStarts you don't need to know any code to create a beautiful website. The whole process is so confusing it leaves a lot of people wondering how to make a website at all. It's a hassle to manage three different bills and three different companies. If you don't know how to code you might hire a web developer. The process of setting up a traditional website is tedious, technical, and expensive. Traditionally websites are written in HTML code, that code is stored on a server, and a domain is pointed to it. Or do we want courts that let elected the Governor and Legislature decide the policy questions facing our state as long as they stay within the broad boundaries marked out in our constitutions.WebStarts is everything you need to create and maintain your very own website. Voters should ask themselves: do we want to return to the early 2000s, when a judicially activist majority on the Court undid decades of settled law in four short years before voters put a firm stop to it in 2008. Reversing the precedents upholding these and other laws will substantially upset the status quo of our lives and our economy. A four-vote majority on the Court, untethered to text and zealous to overturn precedent, will be anxious for opportunities to strike down long-standing laws like the Act 10 reforms, right to work, and school choice. If Protasiewicz wins, however, it could be transformational. On the one hand, if Kelly wins, it could be a fairly straightforward affair: smart lawyers will argue difficult cases, and Justice Kelly will resolve them based on the laws given to him by the Legislature and the people. Which is exactly what we should want in a judge. These and other opinions show his style: deeply thoughtful, carefully crafted, and committed to the Constitution. Marquette University, he wrote a landmark defense of First Amendment rights, a pillar of protection for academic freedom at a time when free speech is threatened on many campuses. Department of Revenue, he sided with a taxpayer against agency bureaucrats, insisting that elected judges and not unelected government insiders must determine the meaning of the law. In two of them, he wrote opinions that are recognized nationally for their intellectual leadership. In case after case, Kelly decided the questions presented based on the law as written. No wonder sheriffs, district attorneys, and law enforcement unions are backing Kelly.īy contrast, Kelly’s four years of previous service on the Wisconsin Supreme Court show he is the right choice on Tuesday. And her record on the bench is equally disqualifying, displaying a consistent pattern of giving low bail and short sentences for violent criminals. Janet Protasiewicz has been campaigning by sharing her “values,” telegraphing her political preferences to voters with a brazen audacity beyond anything we’ve seen in the modern history of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The records of the two candidates for Supreme Court make Dan Kelly the obvious choice on that standard. The judge applies the law to the facts before that judge.” And so it’s not the heart that compels conclusions in cases. Supreme Court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor put it well: “udges can’t rely on what’s in their heart. Let's start by remembering it is a judge that we are electing, a black-robed magistrate of integrity and intellect who should fairly decide the cases and controversies that come before them, not based on their personal values or political preferences but based on the law. Watching the television ads or reading the mail the last few weeks, a voter could be forgiven for thinking their April ballot features a race for governor or senator, what with the constant references to hot button political issues like redistricting and abortion. He says Daniel Kelly will uphold the law and important rights like free speech.He says Janet Protasiewicz has injected politics into a judicial race and has been a poor circuit court judge.Suhr is an attorney in Cedarburg, Wisconsin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |